Monday, February 6, 2012

Carwin: Accomplice to murder?


   The in class trial regarding whether Wieland be held responsible for the death of his wife and children created a great discussion. However it also prompted the question of whether Carwin should be held responsible for his actions and his influence over Wieland. In the trial the group arguing that Wieland was innocent argued that Carwin is the one who is 100% responsible for Wieland’s actions. Although I don’t agree that Carwin is 100% responsible for the crimes committed in this novel, I do agree that Carwin should be held responsible taking advantage of Wieland. As well as having influence over Wieland’s actions.
            It is no mystery that Wieland is the individual responsible for physically murdering his wife and children; as he confesses to the crime himself. However, his reasoning behind his heinous crimes is based on his devotion to God. He states that “it is needless to say that God is the object of my supreme passion” (159). Wieland claims the voices he was hearing were coming from a higher power. He states “As it spoke, the accents thrilled to my heart: -‘thy prayers are heard. In proof of thy faith render me thy wife. This is the victim I choose. Call me hither, and here let me fall.’ The sound, and visage, and light vanished at once” (161). The murder of his wife is identified through Wieland’s eyes as a sacrifice to God. However, what he was not aware of was that these voices were coming not from God but from Carwin.
            Although it was Carwin who was manipulating everyone with his unknown mysterious voices his confession to his actions brings to light the extent of his involvement in Wieland’s crimes. He states “Great heaven! What have I done? I think I know the extent of my offenses. I have acted, but my actions have affected more than I designed. This fear has brought me back from my retreat. I come to repair the evil of which my rashness was the cause and to prevent more evil. I come to confess my errors” (188). Carwin show’s great remorse and guilt as he confesses to Clara that he has been the one producing the voices that Wieland, Pleyel and she have been hearing. It is clear by his reaction that he is aware of his wrongdoing and the harm that his actions have caused. However he is quick to clear his name of the murders as he states “I am not the villain. I have slain no one; I have prompted none to slay; I have handled a tool of wonderful efficacy without malignant intentions, but with caution” (190). If his intentions weren’t malignant at all then why is it that he shows so much guilt and remorse to Clara? Why is he trying to clarify his actions? He wouldn’t be feeling guilty if he didn’t feel that he had done something wrong, which he has. It is true that he was not the one who murdered but if it wasn’t for his use of ventriloquism he wouldn’t have mislead Wieland into thinking that he was receiving orders from a higher power.
            The reader is never truly told Carwin’s reason and intentions to why he decided to manipulate Wieland and the rest of the characters. Although he doesn’t admit it he was trying to stir some type of controversy by manipulating Wieland and scarring the other characters. He knew his ventriloquism gave him some type of power that none of the other characters had so he used it to his advantage until it went too far and caused harm. Carwin took advantage of Wieland's religious views and commitment and used him as his prey. Like Clara stats “Carwin was the instigation” (209). He wasn’t the one who committed the crimes but he was the one who gave Wieland the final push to commit those crimes making him an accomplice.


No comments:

Post a Comment